Google ad: "You Can Sleep Less!"

Perhaps, but I probably shouldn't.


There's a moderately-irritating radio ad that they're playing at the moment for a series of 'save the planet' extras in The Daily Terrorgraph. Apart from the most obvious thought - that the Terrograph is mostly a Liberal Party apologist newspaper, and how much space could it possibly take to tell people how to believe that global warming doesn't exist? - the ad is a mashup of previous Daily Terrorgraph radio ads and covers not driving, changing light globes, turning off appliances, and recycling. So, now that I've gotten over the constant changing of voices, all I can think of when I hear it now is that they've completely left out canvas bags.


Also, weather: Plz to gives my wintarz back, kthx?

Date: 2007-08-28 06:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com
The medical products are important and necessary, so the "NUKLEARZ IZ ALL EEBIL!" set should probably think that one over, but still, nuclear power = bad.

Especially with an environment like this, that effectively says "Hello. I am your geography. My alternate power sources, let me show you them."

but still... balance? Telegraph? I'm amazed.

Date: 2007-08-28 07:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ryttu3k.livejournal.com
Well, yeah, the medical stuff is a neccesary evil and doesn't have a huge output anyway. So one reactor, dedicated only to medical? Fine, although I'd prefer one that isn't smack bang in the middle of suburbia. But running the country on the Libs' two dozen planned reactors? NOT COOL!!

"Hello. I am your geography. My alternate power sources, let me show you them."

*inhales pieces of tomato*

...Ow.

Date: 2007-08-28 07:08 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com
In all fairness, the reactor was there first. The suburbs were built around it later, which is a kind of idiocy that takes real talent - doubly so to then complain about the fact that they've built next to a nuclear reactor. The new reactor was built in the same place so that they could use the same infrastructure to manage the fuel, waste, and products.

Date: 2007-08-28 07:20 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ryttu3k.livejournal.com
Yeah, fair enough, I guess. Maybe they should just whack the next one out in the bush? If it goes kablammo (that's a technical term), we can have radioactive sheep!

Profile

active_apathy: (Default)
active_apathy

April 2009

S M T W T F S
   123 4
56 78 9 1011
12131415 16 1718
19 202122232425
2627 28 29 30  

Style Credit

  • Style: (No Theme) for [insert name here]

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 25th, 2026 08:57 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios