Let's say I suspected someone webcheating on a memequiz. Now, the obvious thing to do is to just ignore it, and let that person live with their guilt, so on, so forth, et cetera, except that they probably won't be feeling any kind of guilt over it and maybe the kind of elated thrill that inflating a number on the Internet gets them.

This isn't entirely without reason. Recently, one of the players in my ongoing memequiz has been giving answers in a way that defies all apparent trends, and looks almost exactly like a poorly-conceived strategy for trying to not be caught webcheating (like, say, not getting #49).

So, dear LJers, the question is this: given the constraints of reality (ie, iocaine powder doesn't really exist), what is the appropriate way to deal with a suspected webcheat?



And now that's all posted - coming later: books, gateway drugs, and odd reminders about communities.

Date: 2007-07-28 04:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com
I had a picture that might've turned into a background, but I was never really happy with it, so... stuff. Ideas are always good, though.

Date: 2007-07-28 07:22 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] laurenmitchell.livejournal.com
Okay, well, what I'm thinking of doing is getting lots and lots of book cover thumbnail pics and making a big background that can then tile together.

Profile

active_apathy: (Default)
active_apathy

April 2009

S M T W T F S
   123 4
56 78 9 1011
12131415 16 1718
19 202122232425
2627 28 29 30  

Style Credit

  • Style: (No Theme) for [insert name here]

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 30th, 2026 03:45 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios