It's time to talk about my day. My day involved commerce, rulebreaking, books, conversation, music, jingly noises and money.

Thanks. See you all next entry!

I imagine you're probably looking to read this in a shade more detail than that. So, with no implied chronology...

I had an interview today. After all, employment means money. I got to talk about my lack of previous experience, how I want to try to get myself a degree in professional writing*, and how early I could arrive. All in all, I feel things went reasonably well.

This is the kind of thing that's interesting and important, and it gets a shorter paragraph than the vast majority of trivial details. Yay me.

On an almost-related matter, I hate interviews. Hate them. Hate hate hate. Hatehatehatehatehate. I barely even think of them for days beforehand, feel calm on the day, and feel confident up until about ten minutes before the interview. And then?

I realise I'll be ten minutes early, and my train of thought looks like this.
Interrupting interviews probably makes a bad impression. Being late definitely does. How can you kill ten minutes and not be late. How can I kill it? *pace, pace* Oooh! Nine minutes. Is five minutes early ok? What if their clock is different? Oh god, oh god, they'll hate me and I'll make an idiot of myself and I need to stop pacing about and there's still eight minutes and forty-three seconds and why can't time go faster? But not so fast it makes me late! Could I read a book? Would I stop in time? Must not be late, must not be late... seven minutes fifty-seven... um... maybe if I sit down. Where? Nearby, but not too close and I must be looking very silly now and I don't care what the random people think of me but what if the interviewer thinks I'm silly and seven-mintes-thirteen. There's a library right there I could go in there but never be seen again for hours so no library for me and now my mental punctuation's gone. Oh! There's some! Six minutes twenty and I could just go there but I'd be too early just need to kill another minute or two and it should be safe a few minutes early can't look too bad and mental punctuation where are you? *pace, pace* I thought I stopped pacing! *pace, pace* Fine. *pace, pace* And now I'm all tense and I'll screw up the interview. Yay me. Five minutes fifteen and can I go yet?
And so it continues. I manage to think faster and faster on less and less as an interview draws closer and closer until, just before I go in, I'm thinking impossibly fast about nothing.

I shall call it 'nerve-ana'.

Also, I bought things today. Let's start with the puppies, who got a new toy. It's a ball with a jinglybellthingy in the middle. This jinglybellthingy gets Murphy all interested, but Montie doesn't seem terribly fussed over it. The net result is that it's now possible to hear Murphy running about outside.

Jinglejinglejinglejinglejinglejingle, you hear, as he runs away.
jinglejinglejinglejinglejinglejingle, you hear, as he runs closer.

He likes it. He likes making jinglynoises. I just hope he doesn't eat the ball and swallow the jinglybellthingy. Montie doesn't like it. I hope he doesn't make Murphy swallow the jinglyballthingy so that he doesn't have to hear it anymore.

I bought a CD! It's a 2-disc edition of Comalies, by Lacuna Coil. The bonus disc has shiny, in the form of pretty-sounding acoustic versions of some of the tracks. They've since been ripped and added to Winamp, and there's a chance I'll stretch the MP3s by playing them too much.

And, I bought books. This is where the rulebreaking comes in.

I used to have a rule - no more than $100 spent on books on any given day. Today, I spent just over $140 on books.

Um, ooops.

This happened at two different bookshops, though, as follows:

Dymocks
(I get 5% of purchase price as store credit)
J K Rowling - Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone - $15.95, +80c store credit
J K Rowling - Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets - $15.95, +80c store credit
J K Rowling - Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban - $15.95, +80c store credit
J K Rowling - Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire - $18.95, +95c store credit
Neil Gaiman - Anansi Boys - $32.95, +$1.65 store credit
Total: $99.75, +$5 store credit

Angus and Robertson
(Currently offering 25% off all full-priced kids' and YA books)
Jonathan Stroud - The Amulet of Samarkand - $18.95, discounted to $14.21
Jonathan Stroud - The Golem's Eye - $19.95, discounted to $14.96
Neil Gaiman - Coraline - $14.95, discounted to $11.21
Total: $53.85, discounted to $40.39

So why, you might ask, did I buy the HP books for their full price? Simple. I like the covers with the black spines more. I have two more of them to buy, but I probably won't need them until near the end of March. Which reminds me: People need to join [livejournal.com profile] apathy_books, because it'll be fun. And because they'll be the first to know just what I think of HP.

Mr Stroud was a recommendation from [livejournal.com profile] fireyfox, many months ago. I've bought two of them, because I finish what I start (No, really. Which is why I plan to finish my 300-second Firefly series sometime this year). I didn't buy the third because it was a different size to the other two, and I care about the aesthetics of my shelf.

Lastly, Neil. Anansi Boys is the next to be read, and I read Coraline start to finish on the bus. It's a lovely book, full of all the reasons why we love Neil - especially his elegant, neat style, with beautifully composed sentence after beautifully composed sentence in a way that lets the story speak for itself. If you haven't read Coraline, do so. In the words of Pterry, "you will never think about buttons in quite the same way again."

And that's it for today. If the title makes no sense, remember to glance at the mood.


* "But you never write anything!" shouted the huddled masses. They were, of course, huddled over books. Her huddled masses would never abide the thought of just being curled up in an alleyway with a bottle of cheap wine.

Especially not a Half Mile Creek cabernet sauvignon. There's a reason why it's only $5 a bottle. That's $5 Australian, mind you. The money in Monopoly is nearly worth more.

If ever the masses dared to ask, there'd be a short and frankly puzzling explanation. She'd tell them all about it - how she would've written things, once upon a time, for no other reason than there was an hour to kill and an idea in dire need of expression. How she'd have scribbled away, and scribbled some more, then given up on reading it and typed something completely different. Ultimately, how she'd needed a third script book on the creative writing question of her 3-unit English paper and just why hadn't the markers liked the dark fantasy murder plot? Incidents and details, fuzzy and half-remembered, but for a tragically unifying theme.

She didn't write so much in recent days, because they'd never said anything about it. They'd never told her what was wrong with it - they'd just bounce away happily, and she'd be horridly confused as to just why they wouldn't say anything. Could it be that terrible? Didn't they want her writing to be better? would it have felt impolite and crushing to point out any more than a semicolon used where a comma was the appropriate mark?

And even though the 'they' had changed, she still didn't do it. She felt hesitant with critiques for others - after all, her experience said to her that pointing things out just wasn't Done. It wasn't the right thing. It was frowned upon. It had found itself banished to the coldest corners of faraway places to which few go and from which fewer return. And then, on the few occasions she'd done it, things that felt nitpicky were welcomed. Even the rewording of a whole chapter was met with happysquees... or was it thoughtful murmuring?

It was the kind of thing that made her wonder if it might just be worthwhile to repost an earlier meme. Or, maybe she should just make up that convoluted modern-fantasy noir cybercrime technothriller with delicious pulpy filling. Or both.

Date: 2006-01-12 02:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ryttu3k.livejournal.com
WHEE HP.

I've read Coraline. It was pretty good!

Date: 2006-01-12 02:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com
That it was. I only just finished it before my stop, too. Yay Neil.

Date: 2006-01-12 02:49 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ryttu3k.livejournal.com
Indeed. What's Anansi Boys about?

Date: 2006-01-12 02:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com
I can't say for certain, since I haven't read it yet. There's a bit about it here, if that helps.

Everyone I know who's read it liked it, and I've liked Neil's other works so I'm feeling hopeful about this one.

Date: 2006-01-12 03:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ryttu3k.livejournal.com
Looks good!

Date: 2006-01-12 03:19 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] captainsblog.livejournal.com
I picked up the new Gaiman at the library last week after showing up an hour early for a court appearance and it just seemed the best of the NewBooks!NewBooks!NewBooks!NewBooks!NewBooks!....NewBooks* shelf.

The back cover describes it as a cross between Douglas Adams and PD Wodehouse, and yeah, I can see that. It's beautifully written, don't get me wrong, but I have trouble with works full of unlikable characters, and with the exception of Charlie and Rosie, unlikability seems to be an admission ticket to this plot.

* It's a Letterman thing.

Date: 2006-01-12 03:33 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com
I expect I'll like it. I don't mind characters who are difficult to like, so long as they have actual motivations and a personality. I don't like cardboard cutouts put in just to be unlikable.

Date: 2006-01-12 04:37 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] deepfishy.livejournal.com
Yay Coraline! I love it for how beautiful it is, how neatly it fits together and unfolds. And now I sound like I'm talking about some kind of Victorian curio. But it's true :)

Let us know how Jonathan Stroud turns out, yes? That's the second time someone's recommended that series, and I keep forgetting when I go bookshopping.

Personally, I try not to think too hard about money when I'm in a good bookstore (except to make sure I have enough funds to cover purchases). What price a good read? (okay, apart from the one on the little sticker on the back)

And what is a degree in professional writing? Does it mean things like journalism and articles, or does it mean "creative writing", ie, novels?

*squinches eyes up to read tiny, tiny font*

Um. If you ever want some critiquing, I'm happy to be of service. My email box is always open ;)

Date: 2006-01-12 04:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com
I loved it too. It's elegantly pretty. And everyone needs to know a Mr Bobo, just so they can say it all the time.

I'll let my whole LJ know. Does that sound fair?

I don't mind the prices. The limit is mostly to protect me from that fact.

It means lots of things. Garth Nix has the exact same degree as I'd like, but that wasn't a factor influencing my desire. It should be more accurately termed an Arts degree, in professional writing. And I think it means both.

Is it too small? I can make it bigger.

Date: 2006-01-12 06:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] leila82.livejournal.com
Yay interview going well! But boo on interviews in general - I'm one of those super-punctual sorts, which means I inevitably show up 15 minutes before I'm supposed to and then just sit (or stand) there getting more and more shaky and jittery and nervous. I would pace but then I worry that the interviewer can hear my heels go clip-clop-clip-clop *pause* clip-clop-clip-clop *repeat* and will want to kill me.

And now that I think about it, I had that problem with jingly things. I used to wear jingly bell anklets, and while they made a pleasant jingle noise when I walked, I'm pretty sure some of my friends wanted to strangle me with my own anklets, because I have a bad habit of unconsciously shaking my foot and that would make the anklets do this frantic-jingle thing, usually in the midst of an exam.

I didn't realize people wanted an honest critique of what they read, especially grammar wise, which is why I'm so hesitant in giving it unless someone asks specifically. Also because I don't write myself, and because my grammar has gotten hideous in the past few years.

Date: 2006-01-12 06:05 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com
15 minutes? That'd be terrifying. Ten is bad enough.

That's close enough to bells on your toes. Did you have some on your fingers?

Critiquing what I read would be a fun exercise, but ultimately not a terribly useful one. Also, I suspect your handwriting will be worse than your grammar sometime soon.

Date: 2006-01-12 06:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] leila82.livejournal.com
15 minutes is very bad.

Hee, well I did manage to find a ring in India with jingly bells on it, but I didn't wear it that often. The anklets were an all-the-time sort of thing for a few months.

And obviously I need someone to beta my comments, because that was supposed to be wrote, not read. I'm never agin posting a comment without finishing my morning caffeine first. The handwriting, however, is still nice! Or legible, at least.

Date: 2006-01-12 06:16 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com
Not that it matters. These days, if you want music wherever you go, it's easier to just get an iThingy MarketingGimmick.

You mean they'll let you pass doctor!exams with legible handwriting? When did this happen?

Date: 2006-01-12 06:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] leila82.livejournal.com
Or get one that is not an iThingy, but is still just as awesome and wonderful! And long lived too, hooray!

I think I took the doctor exams on a bad handwriting day. I am sneaky like that ;)

Date: 2006-01-12 03:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theshadowlurker.livejournal.com
"my 300-second Firefly series"

HEY I'LL BE ABLE TO UNDERSTAND THAT NOW. *runs off to read*

Date: 2006-01-12 03:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] laurenmitchell.livejournal.com
I was very pleased with the crit you gave me for that chapter of Rainbow I posted aeons ago. I just haven't done anything about it yet because I am actually very lazy.

Date: 2006-01-12 03:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com
That's not true. You shelved it for NaNo, and then it was the Month of Insanity, and then you were made to personifiy wibble and squee. I don't think you were being lazy at all.

Date: 2006-01-12 03:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] laurenmitchell.livejournal.com
NaNo is the Month of Insanity.

Plus, I got dinosaurs. That's my excuse.

Date: 2006-01-12 03:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com
I meant the Month of Commercial Insanity. :)

They betrayed you! Suddenly... and, and... inevitably!

Date: 2006-01-12 04:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] laurenmitchell.livejournal.com
Oh, the other Month of Insanity.

2007 will be interesting, because I will have three consecutive Months of Insanity. Wedding in October, NaNo in November, and the Big Damn Month of Spending Very Little Money On Christmas Presents As I Won't Have Any Left in December.

They took over my desk. I'm clearly not at fault here.

Date: 2006-01-12 04:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com
Clearly not. Also, the image name amuses me.

Date: 2006-01-12 04:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] laurenmitchell.livejournal.com
Did you know that T-Rexes were fluorescent blue? It must be true... the tiny plastic toy couldn't possibly be inaccurate!

Date: 2006-01-12 04:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com
Of course not! They used their time machine, and took photos to make sure it was right.

Date: 2006-01-18 02:38 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] laurenmitchell.livejournal.com
*nods*

By the way, I just came back to this entry to say that Danny's new housemate has brought large quantities of Gaiman with him. I've read Coraline -- which was superbly creepy -- and Stardust, which was pretty. Strange, but pretty.

At the moment I'm rereading Smoke and Mirrors I'm also rereading Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, and Laurell K. Kamilton's Seduced by Moonlight. I'm planning on rereading Nix (the Old Kingdom, anyway) in order to better contribute to [livejournal.com profile] apathy_books.

Date: 2006-01-18 06:16 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com
Shiny, shiny and shiny, with a side of shiny. :)

And, yay Gaiman. I very much liked Stardust; it and Coraline are probably my favourites from Neil at the moment.

Date: 2006-01-12 11:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] palmer-kun.livejournal.com
You think I read your LJ for the polls?

Remember... sometimes people say nothing because there's nothing to say, not because they're hiding things.

Repost the meme. It'll be worthwhile.

Date: 2006-01-12 11:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com
I didn't mean strictly not writing anything, so much as not writing things like fictionythingies. (How many words can be made up in one entry and its comments?)

I do mean to repost it, maybe a bit later this evening. :)

Date: 2006-01-12 11:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] palmer-kun.livejournal.com
I'll admit, the polls are a major attraction :)

You need to remedy the lack of both originalfictionythingamajigs and fandomfictionythingiemabobbers.

In quantity.

You do that. I'll come up with something for you to do.

Date: 2006-01-12 11:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com
Indeed I do. And I need to get a Plot started in a certain community.

Date: 2006-01-12 11:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] remingtonmaxwel.livejournal.com
You do that. It's gorram HARD for me to up and find work without some help from you, after all.

Date: 2006-01-12 11:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com
Shiny. Just get the crew having dinner, or such. It's a great chance for them to interact. And maybe get a wave from someone disreputable.

Date: 2006-01-20 01:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] remingtonmaxwel.livejournal.com
Dinner was served... a week ago :p (http://community.livejournal.com/apathy_games/9354.html)

Date: 2006-01-20 09:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com
In a ramshackle rambling thread of chaos. And now, your pilot's mostly-back. :)

You'll get something shortly. It's on The List. *nods authoritatively*

Date: 2006-01-20 09:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] remingtonmaxwel.livejournal.com
Pizza and beer is inherently chaotic.

People are hungry, not only for pizza, but action.

Date: 2006-01-20 10:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com
Action will come. Some people might get shot, and you may even need to toss someone out an airlock.

Not anyone whose name includes the word 'sparkle', mind you.

Date: 2006-01-20 11:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] remingtonmaxwel.livejournal.com
Can we maybe vote on the whole "murdering people" issue?

Date: 2006-01-20 11:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com
But they did!

Profile

active_apathy: (Default)
active_apathy

April 2009

S M T W T F S
   123 4
56 78 9 1011
12131415 16 1718
19 202122232425
2627 28 29 30  

Style Credit

  • Style: (No Theme) for [insert name here]

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 17th, 2026 08:28 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios