So, today. Today was a fun excursion back into the world of exchanging money-thingies for goods and services. This focused on my adventures at the supermarket, and then a long exchange with bookshop employees.

More on that later.

As you've all no doubt heard, the American Film Institute has compiled its list of their top 100 movie lines. As you'd expect, this is a very US-centric list, and puts lines from Titanic up there with one of the few lines to be in all six Star Wars films.

To counter this oversight, we have a special survey to see how it should've been. Well... according to my readership, that is. Take no notice of the questions; they're all worth one point each. The worst line will be specially pointed out, and open to mocking. Please, tell me who said it and in what, because that'll make things much easier later on.

And now, the
[Poll #546977]

Moving on, we have grocery shopping. Saturday morning grocery shopping is something of a contact sport, and creates all kinds of personal hazards. This was made up for by a rather nice peppermint and chocolate topping, which appealed to my love of peppermint and chocolate. This is also the first time in quite some time that I've had to put things onto, rather than into, the trolley. My cupboards managed to get that empty.

Particularly notable events included:
  • Getting through the Old-Folk Shopping Trolley Blockade in the aisle with tea and biscuits, of which I wanted both.
  • The Perilous Stench of the Man Who Washes Infrequently
  • The Animated Bulk of the Large, Footballer-esque Man Who Spies Food Samples
  • The Unsupervised Small Child who is a Trainee Sprinter with a Talent for Running Into People. Literally.
  • The Trolley of Uncertain Direction
In short, it was completely normal.

And, next, my bookshop experience. I went to buy more books, obviously, and ended up with Pyramids by you-know-who (No, Potterfans. I mean Mr Pratchett) and Fool Moon, the second Dresden Files book from [livejournal.com profile] jimbutcher. And then, it was time to do some ordering to catch up a little with book recommendations.

Wicked was easy enough to order - there's a copy on this side of all relevant oceans, and it should be on its merry way. No price as yet, but that doesn't seem to worry them at all. The hardest part was convincing a cricket-obsessed shop assistant's ears to work properly.

And then Arrows of the Queen posed less of a challenge, though it has to come from the US. Now, this is where things get odd. The other two in its trilogy will cost about $AU20 each to buy. This one, coming halfway around the world, will cost me $AU12. Does that seem right to you?

And, lastly, Goldman's abridgement of Morgenstern took a whole 3 hours out of my day in actual reading. The abridgement notes amused me, and almost make me want to buy a copy of the full Morgenstern version with 70 pages of training and 14 pages of hats and the lineage of the king of Florin and a million other details, principally because it's immensely detailed and obsessively accurate about its historical details.

And that's it for the moment.

Date: 2005-08-07 02:30 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] palmer-kun.livejournal.com
Followup Primus: My bad. I was thinking of the National Film Registry (and it's older than 10 years for that, double bad on my end).

Followup Secundus: It's an easy mistake to make. You have not made yourself look like an idiot, merely like a geek.

Fact: Geeks are sexy. So I fail to see a problem here.

Date: 2005-08-07 02:49 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com
Followup Primus Response: The AFI poll did, however, only list US films. Furthermore, the results can be reasonably determined to have been influenced by the way the AFI set the ballot; there were five write-in spaces, and the most represented film in the list - Casablanca - happened to have the greatest number of quotes in the final list. They determine US film by US investment, so money is more important than culture; this explains why, for example, LotR:TtT is in there.

Followup Secundus Response: Quite possibly. It makes for fiction that's doubly inventive, and the sheer absurdity can make it more believable. Still, it doesn't really help just yet. Give it a little while.

Reply to Factual Statement: Oh? And what's your source?

Date: 2005-08-07 03:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] palmer-kun.livejournal.com
Continuation Uno: Perhaps this is true. Unfortunately, I cannot be bothered to truly care that much. I've never been much of a movie person to begin with. Besides, I'd assume anything billing itself as the American Film Institute would be biased.

Continuation Dos: It's The Princess Bride. It is so many different flavours of awesome that the details are irrelevant.

Confirmation of Fact: I am poor, physically unattractive, have a child, have spent most of my adult life unemployed, tend to annoy people, have highly unusual practices and beliefs and am a total geek.

Despite having pretty well every aspect of my character working against me... I somehow have not one, but three significant others at the same time. They've even told me they love my geekiness. There is no other possible explanation.

Confirmation 2: http://www.livejournal.com/community/welovegeeks/576349.html
This speaks for itself.

Profile

active_apathy: (Default)
active_apathy

April 2009

S M T W T F S
   123 4
56 78 9 1011
12131415 16 1718
19 202122232425
2627 28 29 30  

Style Credit

  • Style: (No Theme) for [insert name here]

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 30th, 2026 08:44 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios