Right. Now, for the record, I feel like I may have injected unwarranted drama into your LJ-lives. Oops. I, for one, am happy to be able to Intarweb so soon.
So, I should have two days of news for you. Just my luck that I'd be in a drug-induced sleep for the most exciting part of yesterday, in which a number of masked persons attacked me with pointy objects in a rather cold room.
So, instead, I get to talk about the rest. They kept me in overnight, which means that I spent $5 for the privelege of watching TV and convinced my visiting parents to buy me a new hairbrush and a copy of American Gods, which is a lovely and interesting tale. I'd give you a little summary, but we all know what Thoth thinks of maps. Still! Enjoyable. Between it and Smoke and Mirrors, I'm rather looking forward to Neverwhere, probably after a brief stopover with Sourcery.
But on with the tale. I think my eyes are now sensitive to a thousand different shades of white, and I don't think I've ever had the misfortune of drinking quite so much slightly warm tea. I've been poked and prodded inappropirately by people getting paid for the privelege, and pushed around altogether too much for my liking.
So, now, why am I typing this so soon when I said there'd be at least another day or two before I'd be able to? That, dear friends, fans and stalkers, is a result of the surgeon's decision not to perform the procedure that I'd actually consented to. Instead, a far less invasive version with the same results was favoured instead. The benefits? I get all my friends back sooner, I still have a stack of books to read at my leisure, and there's not one stitch to be taken out.
And that's about it for that, really, unless you want the intimate details of them losing my notes, my chart, and then both at the same time.
But that's enough about me for the moment. What have you all been up to? LJ-Stalkers, this question includes you - is there anything you've posted that you think I should read? A new comm you think I should join? Just point the way with linky goodness, and I'll see to it.
So, I should have two days of news for you. Just my luck that I'd be in a drug-induced sleep for the most exciting part of yesterday, in which a number of masked persons attacked me with pointy objects in a rather cold room.
So, instead, I get to talk about the rest. They kept me in overnight, which means that I spent $5 for the privelege of watching TV and convinced my visiting parents to buy me a new hairbrush and a copy of American Gods, which is a lovely and interesting tale. I'd give you a little summary, but we all know what Thoth thinks of maps. Still! Enjoyable. Between it and Smoke and Mirrors, I'm rather looking forward to Neverwhere, probably after a brief stopover with Sourcery.
But on with the tale. I think my eyes are now sensitive to a thousand different shades of white, and I don't think I've ever had the misfortune of drinking quite so much slightly warm tea. I've been poked and prodded inappropirately by people getting paid for the privelege, and pushed around altogether too much for my liking.
So, now, why am I typing this so soon when I said there'd be at least another day or two before I'd be able to? That, dear friends, fans and stalkers, is a result of the surgeon's decision not to perform the procedure that I'd actually consented to. Instead, a far less invasive version with the same results was favoured instead. The benefits? I get all my friends back sooner, I still have a stack of books to read at my leisure, and there's not one stitch to be taken out.
And that's about it for that, really, unless you want the intimate details of them losing my notes, my chart, and then both at the same time.
But that's enough about me for the moment. What have you all been up to? LJ-Stalkers, this question includes you - is there anything you've posted that you think I should read? A new comm you think I should join? Just point the way with linky goodness, and I'll see to it.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-28 05:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-28 06:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-28 07:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-28 05:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-28 05:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-28 06:01 am (UTC)Still sorting out my 3.5 version, since I wasn't happy how it was being done on-line... especially the factions.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-28 06:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-28 11:43 am (UTC)I'm in the midst of writing a d20 Supers game myself right now...
What about d20 is dissatisfying to you?
no subject
Date: 2005-07-28 11:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-28 11:55 pm (UTC)I see d20 as being predominantly Gamist rather than Simulationist... it's an excellent game system, but not very good at simulating anything beyond, well, d20
2: That's an eternal problem with classed systems. Classed and classless both have their advantages and flaws. The gamist nature of d20 makes classes well suited to it.
3: Depends on what kind of design you're talking about. Overall I find the design quality on 3.x to be vastly superior to 2nd Ed and older. And better than many other games on the market as well.
4: In the hands of a suitable powergamer, ANY system can be twinked to death. It's also a design feature - the game is meant to be high-powered and epic over-the-top in action and flavour, and without powergaming elements, it just wouldn't work.
5: Story focussed character traits? What exactly do you mean by these, and how do they fit (or not fit) into systems?
6: It ties in with the heavily mechanistic nature of the system, as well as it's design philosophy. Bonuses are easier to handle than penalties (it's a proven fact that people can do mental addition at least 2-3 times faster than mental suntraction) and thus fit the design philosophy better.
So... given all this... what is a game system you DO like, and why?
no subject
Date: 2005-07-29 12:07 am (UTC)5: There's not a lot of point to a character who isn't specifically built for adventuring and killing stuff, in most d20 games. This may just be my perception of it.
6: It does indeed, but the millionth +2 is really pretty useless. I'd rather scrape up one or two tiny bonuses that mean something than have a thousand of them shoved at the roll from every angle. Just because it is *easier* doesn't mean that it should be used as an excuse to roll a d20 with a +124 to whatever it is.
I rather like FATE, Pace, StickGuy, Resus, BRP and SR. Especially FATE, which I love for its expressiveness, simplicity and love of the story.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-29 12:54 am (UTC)5: I find that it all comes out in how you play the game. The system shapes some aspects of the game, sure, but the group is the ultimate arbiter.
The last D&D game I played in, we went five straight sessions without touching the dice, at all. Got experience, did all that jazz.
No dice. Didn't need them. We had plenty of story-driving character traits and other stuff. They simply weren't part of the system, nor do I really feel they should have been. Things handled by the system should be mechanical in nature as much as possible. Story elements to a character should be just that - story, not mechanics.
6: At higher levels, the bonuses can start to get out of hand, but there's not too much than can be done about that. Either you have big modifiers, or big base numbers... and in d20, many of those base numbers are expressed as modifiers anyways (skills, base attack bonus, etc).
...
Go figure you would name a bunch of games I've never heard of.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-28 06:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-28 06:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-28 06:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-28 06:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-28 06:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-28 06:21 am (UTC)Hmm... *gets phonebook, looks up patent office*
no subject
Date: 2005-07-28 06:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-28 06:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-28 06:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-28 06:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-28 07:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-28 06:57 am (UTC)Um... not much else. Check the post with the Willow pic to see where my seats for Wicked are. :)
I shall be on AIM in a few minutes. Stupid boss being on the damn computer with AIM. :/
no subject
Date: 2005-07-28 07:14 am (UTC)Do you have linkiness? If not, I suppose I can just go and find it all by myself.
You shall be indeed! Like right now. Whee! *squish*
no subject
Date: 2005-07-28 07:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-28 07:50 am (UTC)My life has been bereft without you, my dear.
I haven't done anything interesting except get shouted at by a silly man wo rang the wrong number.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-28 08:00 am (UTC)Silly indeed! And there was talk of more Lion King on GMA, which means you have my sympathy.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-28 07:52 am (UTC)Oh, and thank you for linking to the new Serenity trailer a few days ago: there were many excited noises from my friends, and at least one person asking to borrow the DVDs.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-28 08:12 am (UTC)Conversions are good. You have done well with the linkiness.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-28 11:41 am (UTC)The DVDs have been availiable for ages.
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B0000A14WF?v=glance
no subject
Date: 2005-07-29 03:30 am (UTC)The DVDs have been availiable for ages.
I knew it was a TV series first (I think I watched a bit of it when it was on, many moons ago). I knew they'd released it on VHS, because a friend of mine owned them, but I kept forgetting to look for DVDs.
Thank you for saving me the effort :)
no subject
Date: 2005-07-29 03:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-29 09:46 am (UTC)This program is endorsed by Neil himself. He's mentioned using it a few times on his blog to keep his laptop region free when he travels.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-31 08:59 am (UTC)My PC can play any region DVDs anyway, because I use Linux and mplayer. But it's only got a little screen, instead of my nice big TV.
Thanks for the link though: the people I live with use Windows, and it might be helpful to them...
no subject
Date: 2005-07-31 09:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-31 05:46 pm (UTC)Complicated and a bloody pain, but it should work...
no subject
Date: 2005-07-28 08:23 am (UTC)I don't have any linkies for you now---sorry---maybe later.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-28 08:28 am (UTC)And that's ok. I have a smallish flist, but you're all very updatey so it's much, much easier to keep up than to catch up.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-28 09:51 am (UTC)(Well...some people, at least. A few commented in my LJ to say they didn't have one.)
no subject
Date: 2005-07-28 11:52 am (UTC)Neverwhere is moreso a straightforward adventure romp in a somewhat dark and surreal alternate(ish) reality. It's a fast read and great fun.
Stardust is also good - it's basically an epic fairy tale, with all the things that make fairy tales timeless.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-28 11:09 pm (UTC)I'll probably start on Neverwhere a bit later today, since Sourcery ran out of pages this morning.
Looks like I'll have to go looking for a copy of Stardust in a couple of weeks, then.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-28 11:48 pm (UTC)I've only read Neverwhere, Stardust, American Gods and the Sandman graphic novels thusfar... I'm bad. I need to read the Death GNs, as well as Coraline at some point.
Oh, and I've read Good Omens. Which is an absolute must-read if you haven't yet. Co-authored by Gaiman and Pratchett.
I swear... anything Gaiman turns his hand to, he does a masterful job of. Be it TV scripts, novels, comics, radio plays, movie scripts, translations...
no subject
Date: 2005-07-29 03:44 am (UTC)Haven't got around to reading Stardust yet: I'll add it to my list of books to buy when I'm allowed to spend money again.
I still feel happy about the fact that I pegged Wednesday from his introduction of himself to Shadow: normally things like that go straight over my head until the second time I read a book, and spot all the clues beforehand.