Right. Now, for the record, I feel like I may have injected unwarranted drama into your LJ-lives. Oops. I, for one, am happy to be able to Intarweb so soon.

So, I should have two days of news for you. Just my luck that I'd be in a drug-induced sleep for the most exciting part of yesterday, in which a number of masked persons attacked me with pointy objects in a rather cold room.

So, instead, I get to talk about the rest. They kept me in overnight, which means that I spent $5 for the privelege of watching TV and convinced my visiting parents to buy me a new hairbrush and a copy of American Gods, which is a lovely and interesting tale. I'd give you a little summary, but we all know what Thoth thinks of maps. Still! Enjoyable. Between it and Smoke and Mirrors, I'm rather looking forward to Neverwhere, probably after a brief stopover with Sourcery.

But on with the tale. I think my eyes are now sensitive to a thousand different shades of white, and I don't think I've ever had the misfortune of drinking quite so much slightly warm tea. I've been poked and prodded inappropirately by people getting paid for the privelege, and pushed around altogether too much for my liking.

So, now, why am I typing this so soon when I said there'd be at least another day or two before I'd be able to? That, dear friends, fans and stalkers, is a result of the surgeon's decision not to perform the procedure that I'd actually consented to. Instead, a far less invasive version with the same results was favoured instead. The benefits? I get all my friends back sooner, I still have a stack of books to read at my leisure, and there's not one stitch to be taken out.

And that's about it for that, really, unless you want the intimate details of them losing my notes, my chart, and then both at the same time.

But that's enough about me for the moment. What have you all been up to? LJ-Stalkers, this question includes you - is there anything you've posted that you think I should read? A new comm you think I should join? Just point the way with linky goodness, and I'll see to it.

Date: 2005-07-28 05:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] arib.livejournal.com
My LJ was one big ball of stuff yesterday, feel free to give it a peep.

Date: 2005-07-28 06:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] eighthcloud.livejournal.com
Oh, how I love that icon.

Date: 2005-07-28 07:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] arib.livejournal.com
Thanks, my friend [livejournal.com profile] quem98 made it for me, along with this one.

Date: 2005-07-28 05:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] salith.livejournal.com
Just emailed you something :)

Date: 2005-07-28 05:59 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com
Indeed you did! Thanks kindly. :D

Date: 2005-07-28 06:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] salith.livejournal.com
And I'm working on the final one from the box.
Still sorting out my 3.5 version, since I wasn't happy how it was being done on-line... especially the factions.

Date: 2005-07-28 06:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com
To be perfectly honest, I'm plainly dissatisfied with the way that 3.x itself is done. I'd love to find the motivation to actually write out, in nice, readable words, my redesigned d20 system. I know how it works, how to make it work, but I need to figure out how to get it into words so that it can be used instead of just imagined.

Date: 2005-07-28 11:43 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] palmer-kun.livejournal.com
Ooooo... game design? *perks up*

I'm in the midst of writing a d20 Supers game myself right now...

What about d20 is dissatisfying to you?

Date: 2005-07-28 11:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com
Off the top of my head, they'd be:
  • I don't particularly like simulationist systems
  • The rigidity of classes irritates me
  • The pages of classes and PrCs reeks of a poor underlying design
  • It's overly accommodating to powergamers
  • There's a lack of, or penalty for, story-focused character traits
  • There's a bit of a culture of meaningless bonuses

Date: 2005-07-28 11:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] palmer-kun.livejournal.com
1: Ahhh, good old GNS Theory :)
I see d20 as being predominantly Gamist rather than Simulationist... it's an excellent game system, but not very good at simulating anything beyond, well, d20

2: That's an eternal problem with classed systems. Classed and classless both have their advantages and flaws. The gamist nature of d20 makes classes well suited to it.

3: Depends on what kind of design you're talking about. Overall I find the design quality on 3.x to be vastly superior to 2nd Ed and older. And better than many other games on the market as well.

4: In the hands of a suitable powergamer, ANY system can be twinked to death. It's also a design feature - the game is meant to be high-powered and epic over-the-top in action and flavour, and without powergaming elements, it just wouldn't work.

5: Story focussed character traits? What exactly do you mean by these, and how do they fit (or not fit) into systems?

6: It ties in with the heavily mechanistic nature of the system, as well as it's design philosophy. Bonuses are easier to handle than penalties (it's a proven fact that people can do mental addition at least 2-3 times faster than mental suntraction) and thus fit the design philosophy better.

So... given all this... what is a game system you DO like, and why?

Date: 2005-07-29 12:07 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com
3: In some ways, it's a more elegant system than 2e. By no means is it as good as some of the other offerings out there, but it does suit the majority of D&Ders. Where it all falls apart is in some of the later settings; d20 will never feel right for, say, Planescape.

5: There's not a lot of point to a character who isn't specifically built for adventuring and killing stuff, in most d20 games. This may just be my perception of it.

6: It does indeed, but the millionth +2 is really pretty useless. I'd rather scrape up one or two tiny bonuses that mean something than have a thousand of them shoved at the roll from every angle. Just because it is *easier* doesn't mean that it should be used as an excuse to roll a d20 with a +124 to whatever it is.

I rather like FATE, Pace, StickGuy, Resus, BRP and SR. Especially FATE, which I love for its expressiveness, simplicity and love of the story.

Date: 2005-07-29 12:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] palmer-kun.livejournal.com
3: One of the only systems less elegant than 2e is Palladium, IMNSHO. d20 has NOTHING on Palladium for sheer abusive powergaming.

5: I find that it all comes out in how you play the game. The system shapes some aspects of the game, sure, but the group is the ultimate arbiter.

The last D&D game I played in, we went five straight sessions without touching the dice, at all. Got experience, did all that jazz.
No dice. Didn't need them. We had plenty of story-driving character traits and other stuff. They simply weren't part of the system, nor do I really feel they should have been. Things handled by the system should be mechanical in nature as much as possible. Story elements to a character should be just that - story, not mechanics.

6: At higher levels, the bonuses can start to get out of hand, but there's not too much than can be done about that. Either you have big modifiers, or big base numbers... and in d20, many of those base numbers are expressed as modifiers anyways (skills, base attack bonus, etc).

...

Go figure you would name a bunch of games I've never heard of.

Date: 2005-07-28 06:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theshadowlurker.livejournal.com
Nothing the least bit significant has gone on while you were gone, because, in fact, the world was stopping and waiting for you to get back on livejournal.

Date: 2005-07-28 06:06 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com
That explains the lack of clocks, then. :)

Date: 2005-07-28 06:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theshadowlurker.livejournal.com
Of course! All previously outlawed and destroyed clocks have now been reinstated.

Date: 2005-07-28 06:11 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com
Reinstated from destruction? Nifty! We could sell that for millions.

Date: 2005-07-28 06:20 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theshadowlurker.livejournal.com
We could. That would buy me a lot of books. And another bookcase or three, which I'm sure I'll need.

Date: 2005-07-28 06:21 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com
Yes, yes it would. And you could reinstate the first one from its own destruction by all the excess weight.

Hmm... *gets phonebook, looks up patent office*

Date: 2005-07-28 06:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theshadowlurker.livejournal.com
Hmm... I'd have to get rid of the bed or something to find room for all those bookshelves. But really, who needs sleep when you have excessive reading material?

Date: 2005-07-28 06:27 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com
When you nap between pages, it means one of two things - you're very tired, or not quite completely back from anaesthesia. Well... that, and beds are comfortable to read in.

Date: 2005-07-28 06:29 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theshadowlurker.livejournal.com
But not technically necessary! You can read just as well from, say, the floor.

Date: 2005-07-28 06:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com
The floor is dirty, and beneath a bed you get space where more books can be kept.

Date: 2005-07-28 07:05 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theshadowlurker.livejournal.com
Hmmph. Beds are myths anyway.

Date: 2005-07-28 06:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] eighthcloud.livejournal.com
join my new community, [Bad username or site: @ livejournal.com]!

Um... not much else. Check the post with the Willow pic to see where my seats for Wicked are. :)

I shall be on AIM in a few minutes. Stupid boss being on the damn computer with AIM. :/

Date: 2005-07-28 07:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com
I might just do that, despite my current lack of someone by whom to be all besexed.

Do you have linkiness? If not, I suppose I can just go and find it all by myself.

You shall be indeed! Like right now. Whee! *squish*

Date: 2005-07-28 07:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] laurenmitchell.livejournal.com
YAY LINDA'S BACK YAY!

My life has been bereft without you, my dear.

I haven't done anything interesting except get shouted at by a silly man wo rang the wrong number.

Date: 2005-07-28 08:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com
I'll try not to leave you ever again. I missed all my LJ friends.

Silly indeed! And there was talk of more Lion King on GMA, which means you have my sympathy.

Date: 2005-07-28 07:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrpyro.livejournal.com
Neverwhere is a brilliant book: much funnier than American Gods, but still very dark. I need to remember to check if they've released the TV series on DVD yet at some point.

Oh, and thank you for linking to the new Serenity trailer a few days ago: there were many excited noises from my friends, and at least one person asking to borrow the DVDs.

Date: 2005-07-28 08:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com
I've got an hour or so of Sourcery left, and then I think I'll have a bit of a go at Neverwhere. It looks to be quite a tale, especially if it's funnier. I see myself spending a lot of time in Mr Bed, with Mr Book.

Conversions are good. You have done well with the linkiness.

Date: 2005-07-28 11:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] palmer-kun.livejournal.com
Neverwhere started as a TV series and was then novelized and expanded.

The DVDs have been availiable for ages.

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B0000A14WF?v=glance

Date: 2005-07-29 03:30 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrpyro.livejournal.com
Neverwhere started as a TV series and was then novelized and expanded.

The DVDs have been availiable for ages.


I knew it was a TV series first (I think I watched a bit of it when it was on, many moons ago). I knew they'd released it on VHS, because a friend of mine owned them, but I kept forgetting to look for DVDs.

Thank you for saving me the effort :)

Date: 2005-07-29 03:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrpyro.livejournal.com
Dammit, only available in Region 1 DVD. Stupid region-encoding...

Date: 2005-07-29 09:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] palmer-kun.livejournal.com
http://www.dvdidle.com/dvd-region-free-lite.htm

This program is endorsed by Neil himself. He's mentioned using it a few times on his blog to keep his laptop region free when he travels.

Date: 2005-07-31 08:59 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Sadly, my main DVD watching system is a Playstation 2; I'd probably have to mod-chip it or something, which is of dicey legality these days.

My PC can play any region DVDs anyway, because I use Linux and mplayer. But it's only got a little screen, instead of my nice big TV.

Thanks for the link though: the people I live with use Windows, and it might be helpful to them...

Date: 2005-07-31 09:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrpyro.livejournal.com
The other comment was me: I've been away from my PC for the weekend and hadn't noticed that my login had expired.

Date: 2005-07-31 05:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] palmer-kun.livejournal.com
If you have a burner, you could always try ripping and reburning the DVDs on your PC so they're region free?

Complicated and a bloody pain, but it should work...

Date: 2005-07-28 08:23 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] silmaril.livejournal.com
Heal soon.

I don't have any linkies for you now---sorry---maybe later.

Date: 2005-07-28 08:28 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com
Thanks! I hope to.

And that's ok. I have a smallish flist, but you're all very updatey so it's much, much easier to keep up than to catch up.

Date: 2005-07-28 09:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] justwallpaper.livejournal.com
I found out that most people, when younger, envisioned a "tree-running sidekick" running alongside them during long car rides. *nods*

(Well...some people, at least. A few commented in my LJ to say they didn't have one.)

Date: 2005-07-28 11:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] palmer-kun.livejournal.com
American Gods is very much epic/mythic in tone, deeply engrossing and alltogether wonderful.

Neverwhere is moreso a straightforward adventure romp in a somewhat dark and surreal alternate(ish) reality. It's a fast read and great fun.

Stardust is also good - it's basically an epic fairy tale, with all the things that make fairy tales timeless.

Date: 2005-07-28 11:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com
Absolutely agreed; it's a bit obvious in spots, but the style and the execution are absolutely brilliant.

I'll probably start on Neverwhere a bit later today, since Sourcery ran out of pages this morning.

Looks like I'll have to go looking for a copy of Stardust in a couple of weeks, then.

Date: 2005-07-28 11:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] palmer-kun.livejournal.com
American Gods was one of those "Wow..." books for me. The plot just kept building and building in ways I totally wasn't expecting. I also spent a week kicking myself for not figuring out who Mister Wednesday was sooner.

I've only read Neverwhere, Stardust, American Gods and the Sandman graphic novels thusfar... I'm bad. I need to read the Death GNs, as well as Coraline at some point.

Oh, and I've read Good Omens. Which is an absolute must-read if you haven't yet. Co-authored by Gaiman and Pratchett.

I swear... anything Gaiman turns his hand to, he does a masterful job of. Be it TV scripts, novels, comics, radio plays, movie scripts, translations...

Date: 2005-07-29 03:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrpyro.livejournal.com
The Death GNs are both pretty good, although I personally prefer the first one (High cost of living).

Haven't got around to reading Stardust yet: I'll add it to my list of books to buy when I'm allowed to spend money again.

I still feel happy about the fact that I pegged Wednesday from his introduction of himself to Shadow: normally things like that go straight over my head until the second time I read a book, and spot all the clues beforehand.

Profile

active_apathy: (Default)
active_apathy

April 2009

S M T W T F S
   123 4
56 78 9 1011
12131415 16 1718
19 202122232425
2627 28 29 30  

Style Credit

  • Style: (No Theme) for [insert name here]

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Oct. 2nd, 2025 11:10 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios