With polling places across the country opening at 8:00am (and closing at 6:00pm. 6:00pm. Remember this. VOTE BEFORE 6:00PM, OR ELSE) it seems like a reasonably good opportunity to explain how this whole voting caper works here.

So!

1 - Australian Federal Parliament: a Primer

The Australian Federal Parliament is made up of two houses. These are known as the House of Representatives (or Lower House) and the Senate (or Upper House). Elections are held every three years.

1.1 - Australian House of Representatives

This house of Parliament has 150 members, with each representing a single-member electorate of 59,000-120,000 voters, with the number of voters being about equal for all of the electorates in any particular state. Electorates are often called "seats", after the squishy green furniture on offer in the House for those who win.

Every seat in the House of Reps is contested every election. If a party should triumph over the Lower House wins 76 or more seats in the Lower House their special bonus prize is the chance to form Government, and the party leader becomes Prime Minister.

For the last 12 years, this majority has been held by a coalition of the Liberal-in-name-only Party of Australia and the National Party of Australia, and the Prime Minister has been impersonated by a bald, wrinkled muppet with large eyebrows and some kind of speech impediment.

1.2 - Australian Senate

The Senate is required by the Constitution to be about half the size of the House of Representatives, with each state having an equal number of Senators. Each of the six states has twelve Senators, while the two territories have two each. For those playing at home, that makes a total of 76 Senators.

Each election, about half of the Senate seats are contested (36 state seats, and all 4 territory seats), meaning most Senators have six-year terms. If a party wins a majority in the Senate, it's either a neat little bonus (if the Government does it) or merry hell (if the Opposition does it).

For the last 3 years, the Coalition has held a majority in the Senate; as a country, I think we need to look at that and say: "oops".

2 - But isn't this about elections?

Indeed it is! So, without further ado...

2.1 - Voting Equipment and Procedures

Voters in Australia use sophisticated electoral equipment which may be unfamiliar to voters in other countries, particularly the United States; a system free of chads, voting machines, chads, electronic touch-screeny-thingies, chads, levery-punch-card-thingies or old ladies demonstrating how to hack the tallies.

Each voter is provided with two vote collection devices made of a highly-technical flexible writing surface made of acid-free hydrogen-bonded plant fibres, commonly known as PAPER. The voter then takes these pieces of PAPER to a VOTING BOOTH made of cardboard. Votes are registered on the PAPER by making marks with a stick of a clay/graphite mix encased in wood, commonly called a PENCIL. Once the PAPER is appropriately marked with the PENCIL, the PAPER is folded once and placed in a sealed cardboard receptacle called a BALLOT BOX.

If, at any time, the voter feels they've made a mistake, they can be issued with new vote collection devices.

2.2 - The House of Representatives, or: Preferential Voting and You!

The House of Representatives uses a preferential voting system, elsewhere called 'instant-runoff'. Voters may only vote for candidates in their own electorates, and candidates are voted for in order of preference.

To win a seat, a candidate needs to get more than half of the vote for that electorate. Since it's rare for this to happen on first preferences alone, the candidate with the least votes is eliminated, with their votes being redistributed according to their next preference. This continues until someone wins the seat.

To register a vote for the House of Representatives, you use the little green sheet of PAPER. Upon this PAPER, you write numbers in the boxes next to the names of the candidates in order from WANT (1) to DO NOT WANT (...whatever the number of candidates is).

For the politically unaware, party affiliations are written under candidate names.

2.3 - The Senate, or: Single Transferable Votes and You!

The Senate uses a single transferable vote system, which looks rather a bit like a preferential vote unless you're paying attention. Voters may only vote for senators for their state or territory, and may vote for either a group ticket, or for all the candidates in order of preference.

To win a Senate seat, a candidate must reach a certain quota of the vote for their state (or territory). Since 6 senators are elected in each state at any given election, the quota is about one-seventh (or one-third for the territory seats).

To register a vote for the Senate, you use the big white sheet of PAPER. The sometimes very big white sheet of PAPER. There's two options here, divided by a big black line.

Above the line are the group voting tickets. In practice, these are options where the group has figured out where all the preferences will go; pick whichever group you like, write a 1 in its box, and off you go.

Sometimes, though, you want the satisfaction of putting the raving neocon loon as your ninety-seventh preference, in which case you vote below the line. If you vote this way, you number all the boxes below the line in order from WANT (1) to DO NOT WANT (...whatever the number of candidates is), and - this is important - number none of the boxes above the line.

For the politically unaware, party affiliations are shown for the group tickets and for individual candidates, so you can tell the Have a Party Party from the We're In Ur Parlamentz, Takin' Ur Rightz! Party (which may or may not be an alternative name for the Liberal-in-name-only Party of Australia, or for Family First. Who knows?)

3 - How to Vote

So, you know how they hand out those 'how to vote' cards at a legally-required distance from polling places?

This isn't quite one of those. Let's call this "How to Vote Like [livejournal.com profile] active_apathy", which is both a semi-practical demonstration of how to fill in a ballot paper and a sweeping statement on a teensytinylittle bit of Australian politics. Whee.

3.1 - The House of Representatives

I'll get... a staggering four candidates in my electorate. Four. Yay.

So, Labor and the Greens get 1 and 2, respectively. Next it's a choice of the Liberal-in-name-only Party or the... Citizens Electoral Council? WTF?

*checks Wikipedia*

...so, it's further right than the Liberals-in-name-only. That settles it. 3 for the Liberal-in-name-only Party, and 4 for the CEC.

3.2 - The Senate

Sixteen senate candidates. Sixteen! Elections here (ie, in this particular part of the country) are astonishingly boring, but we'll venture below the line anyway.

Let's see: 1-4, some combination of Labor and Green. 5 and 6 can be the Democrats, who'd actually be getting my Labor and Greens preferences anyway under their 'ANYONE BUT HOWARD! DO NOT WANT!' agreement.

Five parties, ten candidates. Nine candidates and Lisa Milat, and my preferences don't matter this far down, but still. 16 for Lisa Milat, 15 for Gary Humphries, 14 for the Random Unknown Liberal-in-name-only, and that's my voting-against all done. Yay.

If only I could stand back and throw darts at the Senate paper for the other spots.

(HINT: don't throw darts at your Senate paper, partly because it's illegal, and mostly because your vote won't count.)

So... hmm. 7 and 8 for the Climate Change Coalition, 13 for Milat's party affiliate, and some combination of 9-12 for the other platforms. Oh, hey, the Nuclear Disarmament Party candidates have the same last name. Cute. 10 and 11 for them.



And there you have it, the electoral process at work. Come back after the counting for 'Yaaaaaay!', 'NOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!', or '...recounts?!' depending on the outcome.

Date: 2007-11-23 01:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] packbat.livejournal.com
I like your voting system! If it weren't for ... well, everything, I'd be campaigning to swipe it for the U.S.

Date: 2007-11-23 02:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com
It's a good system (and I like it more and more every time you have an election); it's like they got together, made a list of ways a voting system can suck, and decided to not do most of them.

Date: 2007-11-24 08:57 am (UTC)
matgb: Artwork of 19th century upper class anarchist, text: MatGB (Default)
From: [personal profile] matgb
I'm involved in a campaign to swipe it for the UK. But by swipe what I really mean is "actually implement it like what we were promised a hundred years ago.

I mean, even the Irish use STV, if it's good enough for them.

But still, nice little summary, I likes it.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com - Date: 2007-11-24 01:49 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2007-11-23 02:10 pm (UTC)
ext_3472: Sauron drinking tea. (Default)
From: [identity profile] maggiebloome.livejournal.com
Heh, nice summary. I'm sort of nervous about my first election.

Date: 2007-11-23 02:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com
Don't be. You'll get your forms, you'll write some numbers, you put the paper in the box, and then you'll probably think is that all?



...it puts the ballot in the box or else it gets the Libs again.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] maggiebloome.livejournal.com - Date: 2007-11-23 02:22 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] maggiebloome.livejournal.com - Date: 2007-11-23 02:23 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com - Date: 2007-11-23 02:34 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] maggiebloome.livejournal.com - Date: 2007-11-23 02:36 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com - Date: 2007-11-23 02:40 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] maggiebloome.livejournal.com - Date: 2007-11-23 02:47 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com - Date: 2007-11-23 02:51 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] ryttu3k.livejournal.com - Date: 2007-11-24 04:05 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com - Date: 2007-11-24 04:15 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] ryttu3k.livejournal.com - Date: 2007-11-24 05:01 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com - Date: 2007-11-24 05:05 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] ryttu3k.livejournal.com - Date: 2007-11-24 05:43 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com - Date: 2007-11-24 05:45 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] ryttu3k.livejournal.com - Date: 2007-11-24 06:23 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com - Date: 2007-11-25 03:10 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] ryttu3k.livejournal.com - Date: 2007-11-25 06:29 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com - Date: 2007-11-25 06:35 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] ryttu3k.livejournal.com - Date: 2007-11-25 06:40 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com - Date: 2007-11-25 11:53 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] saikogrrl.livejournal.com - Date: 2007-11-25 12:25 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] ryttu3k.livejournal.com - Date: 2007-11-25 01:09 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com - Date: 2007-11-25 03:19 am (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2007-11-23 02:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kitsunefury.livejournal.com
I am disappointed in you..

No 'i can has rekountz plz?'?

Date: 2007-11-23 02:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com
Ohnoes! And I no wants rekountz, unless the bad peoples, they get votesez.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] kitsunefury.livejournal.com - Date: 2007-11-23 05:43 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2007-11-23 02:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] deepfishy.livejournal.com
I'm away from home, and will consequently be free of relevant pamphleteers (yay!). Still, I wish the independent in my electorate had a website. What do you stand for, mysterious person?

Date: 2007-11-23 02:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com
Maybe your independent hopes to be appointed to the post of Special Minister for Silence. Or Non-Speaker of the House. Or something.

Date: 2007-11-23 10:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] travellex.livejournal.com
I got number 68 boxes below the line, but I did not get to vote against Lisa Milat (I did get to vote against the Liberty and Democracy party). It is very strange to be worrying, at number 50, what's ones preferences are. Especially counting backwards. "Oh, goodness, I've put Family First before the Carer's Alliance."

Date: 2007-11-24 02:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com
At number 50, your preferences have probably stopped mattering - but not nearly enough to stop thinking "is there any ticket left that's less reprehensible than the Libs?"

Date: 2007-11-23 10:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] laurenmitchell.livejournal.com
We had seven candidates in my electorate. How does one put Family First and One Nation both DO NOT WANT? I couldn't decide who I disliked more. I can't believe there's even an One Nation candidate in Bruce, since Bruce covers Springvale, and Springvale is about 90% Asian. (There was a notable lack of anyone handing out One Nation how-to-vote cards. GOSH HOW ODD.)

Date: 2007-11-23 11:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com
Family First gets the last preference for managing to have policies more reprehensible than One Nation, then One Nation gets the next-to-last preference, and you kind of *twitch* as you leave.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] laurenmitchell.livejournal.com - Date: 2007-11-24 09:49 am (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2007-11-25 12:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] saikogrrl.livejournal.com
Ewww, One Nation.

Also, I canNOT believe that Tony Abbott got reelected to his seat - who the FUCK would vote for him?!?! EWWWWWWWWWWWWWW.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com - Date: 2007-11-25 03:13 am (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2007-11-25 01:24 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ladyphoenixia.livejournal.com
We had labor, liberal, greens... family first, citizens electoral council, christian democrats.

It's a sad, sad day when you have to put liberal as third choice as the others are DO NOT WANT SO BAD.

Seriously, I had to put family first in 4th place. o_O

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com - Date: 2007-11-25 03:06 am (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2007-11-24 04:07 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ryttu3k.livejournal.com
Bradfield EEEEVIL. I went Greens, Labor, DO NOT WANT. (I ended up going Citizens Electoral Council, Christian Democrats, Liberals then Family First, cos Family First are the ones that make me want to stab people the most, but AGH!)

Date: 2007-11-24 04:16 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com
Eek. It is bad indeed when the CEC rates a third preference. :|

Did you check to see if the FF HTVs were maybe misprinted as Family Fist?

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] ryttu3k.livejournal.com - Date: 2007-11-24 05:03 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com - Date: 2007-11-24 05:06 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] ryttu3k.livejournal.com - Date: 2007-11-24 05:43 am (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2007-11-25 12:22 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] saikogrrl.livejournal.com
I heard that the CEC are actually more right than Family Freaks, which sucks, since I put them third as well. >____< ...

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] ryttu3k.livejournal.com - Date: 2007-11-25 01:05 am (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2007-11-25 01:26 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ladyphoenixia.livejournal.com
Hey! You're in my electorate!

I had to put liberals third, as having done research days before, the others are completely nuts. Christian Democrats = restore White Australia Policy, wtf??

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] ryttu3k.livejournal.com - Date: 2007-11-25 01:47 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] ladyphoenixia.livejournal.com - Date: 2007-11-25 02:53 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com - Date: 2007-11-25 03:15 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] ladyphoenixia.livejournal.com - Date: 2007-11-25 03:53 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com - Date: 2007-11-25 04:17 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] ladyphoenixia.livejournal.com - Date: 2007-11-25 04:51 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com - Date: 2007-11-25 05:30 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] ladyphoenixia.livejournal.com - Date: 2007-11-25 05:55 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] ryttu3k.livejournal.com - Date: 2007-11-25 06:26 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] ladyphoenixia.livejournal.com - Date: 2007-11-25 06:32 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] ryttu3k.livejournal.com - Date: 2007-11-25 06:39 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] ladyphoenixia.livejournal.com - Date: 2007-11-25 07:08 am (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2007-11-24 11:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tajessa.livejournal.com
I love your guide :)
a bald, wrinkled muppet with large eyebrows and some kind of speech impediment
It's funny 'cause it's true.

...the fuck? You're in the same seat as me? How is it possible that I did not realise this? Hi!

I do the same "work both ends against the middle" type of voting for the Senate. First the candidates I actually like, then the ones I really hate at the bottom, and everyone else shuffles for position in between.
It's nice that our Senate ballot is small enough that voting below the line is reasonably practicable. One of the bestest bits about the Australian electoral system: I can vote 1 Greens and my vote is not wasted: it goes somewhere even if they don't.

Howard just conceded the election. Whee!

Date: 2007-11-24 01:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com
Mm, yes. But the concession speech was... long, long overdue. SQUEE!

*waves* Apparently? Add together a 4-candidate Lower House paper and a sixteenth preference for that well-spoken (*snerk*) Lisa Milat, it's pretty obvious what electorate it is. :D

My ALP and Greens ended up interleaved on the Senate form, and my other preferences went as advertised. Ellis was pretty much a given, and let's hope Humphries is out. Very out.

And again: SQUEE!

Date: 2007-11-24 01:19 pm (UTC)
ext_50669: (Default)
From: [identity profile] loqia.livejournal.com
While I found your post both informative and lulzworthy, I must say that you win the internets on account of listening to music from the Planescape: Torment soundtrack. Nameless One for Prime Minister!

Date: 2007-11-24 01:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com
...this has given me the delicious thought of the Factions as political parties. There may be a Planescape ficlet or something later.

PAINTER, The
XAOSITECTS

Date: 2007-11-25 12:19 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] saikogrrl.livejournal.com
I enjoy reading your posts so much. ^^

Thank you for this, it was both informative, and hilarious. XD

Date: 2007-11-25 03:20 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com
Yay! I rather hoped it would be. :)

Date: 2007-11-25 01:30 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ladyphoenixia.livejournal.com
Actually here from the metaquotes link to your internet-version post, but I do believe I enjoy this better. Hehe. You seem very interesting, mind if I friend you?

Date: 2007-11-25 03:27 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com
This is, I think, probably the better of the two; the Internets-version distracted me from wanting the Chaser 'this person votes' stamp.

(No, seriously. The person in the queue behind me was trying to come to terms with that complicated 'number all the boxes' concept.)

And, not at all. Friend away! *points to userinfo*

Date: 2007-11-26 02:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chowderhead.livejournal.com
Here via Metaquotes. Just wanted to say; having been a polling centre worker drone on Saturday, I really wish I could have printed this out and posted it all over the place. It would have made my life SO much easier. The level of "wha?" on display from the public was often frightening.

Date: 2007-11-26 02:49 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] active-apathy.livejournal.com
Oh, yes. I longed for the [THIS PERSON VOTES] stamp, less because it;s a comforting thought and more because the element of mockery would've been healthsome.

You'd probably have had to have edited out the opinions, though, or posted it near the HTV gauntlet run; describing Howard as a malevolent Yoda probably counts as fact influencing voters.

I need good web hosting

Date: 2008-09-21 03:44 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Hey Members!

I am looking for best web hosting where I could host many domains...
I also need big bandwidth and space.

Could you please recommend for me some good host? :)

Jeremy.

Profile

active_apathy: (Default)
active_apathy

April 2009

S M T W T F S
   123 4
56 78 9 1011
12131415 16 1718
19 202122232425
2627 28 29 30  

Style Credit

  • Style: (No Theme) for [insert name here]

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 21st, 2026 04:17 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios