![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
And so, I rested. Um... there's not much more to it, really.
*looks for something to pad out daily post*
This is post 296! This means I'll need to come up with things for post 300, which will be Very Soon. See what posting at least once a day* does to me?
*Yes, yes, except the one day where I didn't post, but it's still at least once a day on average so ha!**
**Hey, look! A footnote.***
***And another footnote.****
****I accept this is silly, so I put the question to you: Do I footnote excessively?*****
*****I ask because Another LJer's footnoting has been described as impersonating me.******
******This, too, makes me ask: Do I footnote more than other people on your flists?*******
*******If yes, is this a bad thing?********
********And would it be easier to just use numbers instead?
*looks for something to pad out daily post*
This is post 296! This means I'll need to come up with things for post 300, which will be Very Soon. See what posting at least once a day* does to me?
*Yes, yes, except the one day where I didn't post, but it's still at least once a day on average so ha!**
**Hey, look! A footnote.***
***And another footnote.****
****I accept this is silly, so I put the question to you: Do I footnote excessively?*****
*****I ask because Another LJer's footnoting has been described as impersonating me.******
******This, too, makes me ask: Do I footnote more than other people on your flists?*******
*******If yes, is this a bad thing?********
********And would it be easier to just use numbers instead?
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2006-02-25 04:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-25 04:29 am (UTC)No-one footnotes like you do, baby. ;)
Someone is impersonating you? Well, it was only a matter of time. Perhaps it's time for you to go DEFCOM OMG FRIENDS ONLY?!
... nah.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-25 04:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-25 04:30 am (UTC)*demonstrates*
no subject
Date: 2006-02-25 04:31 am (UTC)Also, *pounce!*
no subject
Date: 2006-02-25 04:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-25 04:37 am (UTC)I only just noticed that those are meant to be shoes.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-25 05:33 am (UTC)There's a footnote
And another little footnote
Funny footnote, fuzzy footnote
Footnote, footnote
Post.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-25 05:37 am (UTC)1Footnote to *gigglefit'o'doom*
no subject
Date: 2006-02-25 09:17 am (UTC)Of course people impersonate you. You don't want to know how many polls I've seen lately with completely arbitrary "TICKYBOX!" questions.
People impersonate you because you rock.
You're the only footnoter on my flist.
If you have more than 2-3 footnotes, numbers are definately better.
Even then, I'm surprised you haven't used † and ‡, among others.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-25 11:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-25 11:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-25 06:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-25 06:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-25 06:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-25 10:18 pm (UTC)And yes, the only person I can think of who footnotes more excessively than you is Terry Pratchett XP
no subject
Date: 2006-02-26 12:04 am (UTC)It's because I don't have the big black moustache, isn't it? I knew I should have gone for the big black moustache!**
*I didn't mean to make you reconsider your footnoting...ness...ism, you know. But the footnotes started budding and I was reminded of you. ;)
**LJ doesn't like my spelling of moustache. It does have the "o" in it, right? Or can it be both ways? *cue English major crisis*
no subject
Date: 2006-02-26 03:23 am (UTC)As for footnotes, I love 'em, but numbers win too.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-26 04:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-26 04:13 am (UTC)*does research*
no subject
Date: 2006-02-26 04:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-26 05:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-26 02:43 pm (UTC)