So, I'm doing that seduction style meme that everyone else is doing. I've already upgraded Flash (from 7 to 9, no less) to do it, and now the damned questions are taking forever to load, so I'll just write while it's fetching them.
Oh, hey - question. *clicks*
So, yes. Meme. Result later. At this rate, much later.
I don't have a lot to say in this entry, either, so I'll try to pad out the writing and/or the editing. Or I'll write a lengthy - oh, question - introduction so that I'll have something to do. And, yes, you can - question - expect that the rest of this entry will be interspersed with little notes for then the questions finally load.
Whee, question.
So! First, praise be to Google, for they've given me a valuable weapon in the mockery of typos. Oh, yes. Now I - question - just need to wait for someone to misspell 'pencil' as 'pencel', AND THEN I SHALL SHOW THEM. Bwaha-question-hahaha. (Which, knowing me, means the idea will amuse me now, and then by tomorrow I'll forget I ever thought about it. Also, question.)
The questions seem to be getting faster. Hoo-ray. Still, this meme? Bad for - question - dialup. And I just accidentally clicked the answer I'd have picked anyway. Go me. [and another question, yey.]
Ha! Take that, meme. I'll do them out of order! And hey, question. If I were a book? Definitely satire.
So! Next item: Leadership spill. Leadership spill! Or, in other words, squeeeeee! (Question.) Yes, folks, Beazley's job (and 28 other senior federal Labor positions!) will be up for a - question - vote on Monday. This means that with any kind of luck, we'll get Rudd and Gillard for the Labor leadership for the next election. I'd prefer for those names to be the other way around, but you can't always get what you want.
Beazley claims he's put in the "hard yards" and that he's "the bloke with the experience to win the next election". (Question.) He also claims he can be an alternative Prime Minister - question, question, question, that sentence refuses to go further. At the moment, though, his platform isn't one for an opposition leader - it's the platform that goes with the Minister For Endorsing Government Policy, Overusing Cliches And Spouting Many Big Words. (Question.)
In other words: Rudd and Gillard ftw, so that next year comes down to Rudd and Gillard ftw.
(Question.)
Sighted today: a book called "Scrapbooking made easy". Let me - question - say that again for you. Scrapbooking made easy. Because, you know, scrapbooking was immensely difficult to start with. Rar. (Question.)
Why is it that we never hear of the times when scrapbooking is - question - difficult? About the keen scrapbooker who accidentally glues their nose into the book? About the - question - disaster when a scrapbooker died from papercut-related complications? (Question.) About the children destined to sniff glue, because mum spent so many hours with glue stick and newspaper clippings? About the rampages caused when the binding of - question - the scrapbook is substandard?
And why aren't there books on how to make scrapbooking more difficult? Extreme Scrapbooking, perhaps. (Question. Whatever does a gumball machine have to do with impulsiv- ooooh.) It could detail the steps needed to, say, scrapbook while performing dangerous aerobatic stunts over water-infested piranhas, or - question - be a reference on how to include a 100% real explosion using only the trusty glue stick.
Eight questions left. This seems to be working out fairly well. Actually, make that seven. Whee.
Today's big annoyance was the bus timetables on the Interwebbernets. (Question.) The useful thing that lets you know what timetable to look at by searching for where you want to go? Disabled, of course, for 'technical reasons'. (Question.) Yes, technical reasons. As nearly as I can tell, it's a moderately techy way of saying 'ZOMGWTFwedon'thavetoexplainourselvestoyouhahahaha'.
(Question.)
4 to go, and no entry content left. Oops. *just does the remaining questions, LOAD TIMES BE DAMNED*
Aaand...
( It's behind the cut! And now it's LJ tag pantomime. )
Oh, hey - question. *clicks*
So, yes. Meme. Result later. At this rate, much later.
I don't have a lot to say in this entry, either, so I'll try to pad out the writing and/or the editing. Or I'll write a lengthy - oh, question - introduction so that I'll have something to do. And, yes, you can - question - expect that the rest of this entry will be interspersed with little notes for then the questions finally load.
Whee, question.
So! First, praise be to Google, for they've given me a valuable weapon in the mockery of typos. Oh, yes. Now I - question - just need to wait for someone to misspell 'pencil' as 'pencel', AND THEN I SHALL SHOW THEM. Bwaha-question-hahaha. (Which, knowing me, means the idea will amuse me now, and then by tomorrow I'll forget I ever thought about it. Also, question.)
The questions seem to be getting faster. Hoo-ray. Still, this meme? Bad for - question - dialup. And I just accidentally clicked the answer I'd have picked anyway. Go me. [and another question, yey.]
Ha! Take that, meme. I'll do them out of order! And hey, question. If I were a book? Definitely satire.
So! Next item: Leadership spill. Leadership spill! Or, in other words, squeeeeee! (Question.) Yes, folks, Beazley's job (and 28 other senior federal Labor positions!) will be up for a - question - vote on Monday. This means that with any kind of luck, we'll get Rudd and Gillard for the Labor leadership for the next election. I'd prefer for those names to be the other way around, but you can't always get what you want.
Beazley claims he's put in the "hard yards" and that he's "the bloke with the experience to win the next election". (Question.) He also claims he can be an alternative Prime Minister - question, question, question, that sentence refuses to go further. At the moment, though, his platform isn't one for an opposition leader - it's the platform that goes with the Minister For Endorsing Government Policy, Overusing Cliches And Spouting Many Big Words. (Question.)
In other words: Rudd and Gillard ftw, so that next year comes down to Rudd and Gillard ftw.
(Question.)
Sighted today: a book called "Scrapbooking made easy". Let me - question - say that again for you. Scrapbooking made easy. Because, you know, scrapbooking was immensely difficult to start with. Rar. (Question.)
Why is it that we never hear of the times when scrapbooking is - question - difficult? About the keen scrapbooker who accidentally glues their nose into the book? About the - question - disaster when a scrapbooker died from papercut-related complications? (Question.) About the children destined to sniff glue, because mum spent so many hours with glue stick and newspaper clippings? About the rampages caused when the binding of - question - the scrapbook is substandard?
And why aren't there books on how to make scrapbooking more difficult? Extreme Scrapbooking, perhaps. (Question. Whatever does a gumball machine have to do with impulsiv- ooooh.) It could detail the steps needed to, say, scrapbook while performing dangerous aerobatic stunts over water-infested piranhas, or - question - be a reference on how to include a 100% real explosion using only the trusty glue stick.
Eight questions left. This seems to be working out fairly well. Actually, make that seven. Whee.
Today's big annoyance was the bus timetables on the Interwebbernets. (Question.) The useful thing that lets you know what timetable to look at by searching for where you want to go? Disabled, of course, for 'technical reasons'. (Question.) Yes, technical reasons. As nearly as I can tell, it's a moderately techy way of saying 'ZOMGWTFwedon'thavetoexplainourselvestoyouhahahaha'.
(Question.)
4 to go, and no entry content left. Oops. *just does the remaining questions, LOAD TIMES BE DAMNED*
Aaand...
( It's behind the cut! And now it's LJ tag pantomime. )
